![]() ![]() ![]() Make a 3 click measuring tool - a single one, for all the cases.ĭirection of drag should specify which dimension is needed. Stop using drop-down lists in the places that need list boxes. It takes 6 clicks to change what is displayed about the component, and it should take 3 - click on the component, select the info, click OK. And make the component after duplication hang on the mouse cursor as if placing new component, with another click placing it (copy-paste, places it so you have to drag it). ![]() Sl_sergey wrote:Please specify what you want to improve in DipTrace GUI?ĭuplicate button. Did I mention parametric parts? Or a 'PartQuest' like interface? Oh, back/forward annotation and audit trails would be good too. One thing that I miss with DipTrace is a programmable user interface, like LISP for AutoDesk but using Python. Cloud based 'Work-Flow' is the catch all of marketing, when you pay for data by the byte not so much. If you watch the video they are adding traces where a decent router would have routed, when you dig deeper the 'WEB' interface is broken with all browsers only the first two menu items work in Resources. It appears they take user built parts and 'Verify' them for all to use so you don't have 're-spin'. Besides, with today's technology one person can do what it took a company to produce 10 years ago. While a bunch of users working on a project sounds like 'fun' at best it's a pain. ![]() And that $125 a month doesn't cover Internet Access Cost (LTE for me) which adds another cost. SoundMod wrote:I would like to see Diptrace's GUI improve and get slick like this while keeping toolbars.Īctually, take a deep look at it because they offer feature that other do not offer and I thinkĭiptrace can compete with them if you carefully craft the future of Diptrace.įor $125 a month per user with limits, I bet DipTrace could produce a fancy user interface along with pages of marketing gib. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |